On 06.03.2015 2:58, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO wrote:
> Hi,
>> So first, please receive my apologies for not having warned in ros-dev about
> this (continuation of) tree restructure I did starting with r66575. Indeed
> this was the first thing to do before doing anything, even if I talked about
> that on IRC and JIRA!
Wrong.
You did not need to warn, you need to get majority of devs to support
this change, to get comments from them, to make sure they continue to
feel "at home" in ReactOS source code.
Right now, for the sake of subjective beautification you just forced
everyone but you to adapt their patches (myself included, I have many
working copies) just because you feel the tree structure was wrong.
This is just ridiculous. As Pierre said, we are a team here. And
teamwork without big issues is what is making our project a good place
to work in, to get pleasure and satisfaction from the work done.
> In fact, the tree restructure discussion started 5 years ago, along with the
> cmake bringup: see the big thread here:
> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2010-July/013257.html .
Imagine what, I was part of it.
> At that
> time the main argument was that we were also in the middle of changing the
> old build system (rbuild) to a new one (cmake) so it was problematic to do
> those two big changes at once. Also at that time, seeing the argumentation
> of Ged, Timo, Jérôme and the few others (active developers) who dared to
> participate to this discussion, it was clear that a tree restructure was
> necessary anyway, sooner or later.
This is called
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-purchase_rationalization . After you
made the change you start explaining that everyone was supporting it, it
was so much needed, and let's just forget about any side-effects it may
have caused.
> In 2012 some tree restructure happened (r56305) by moving around and in a
> more logical manner some core components of win32.
Yep.
> What happens now in 2015, i.e. 5 years after ? We have CMake well
> established, everything works, but only win32 core was reorganized.
Sure, 5 years is a magic number which means you can safely ignore
everyone else and just force your own change.
> I made http://jira.reactos.org/browse/CORE-9111 , people started to give
> proposals. You came back with the almost same argument, that is to finish
> the existing things first (adapt that: at the time of CMake, it was CMake,
> now, it's fix all ReactOS 0.4 bugs), and then improve structure of source
> tree. Since not all the existing bugs will be fixed by then, we can continue
> this way and wait another 5 years in order to have a real tree restructure?
> I don't think so.
> So I took that for granted and committed r66575.
You know, users don't care about source code tree structure. Tree is for
developers. Users (and hence, popularity and usability of ReactOS) like
when ReactOS does not crash, when ReactOS runs their apps, when ReactOS
loads native binary drivers.
And my point is that internal changes (code refactorings, tree
restructures, reformatting) must happen only when the advantage of that
is more than the disadvantage/side effects.
Are you going to say that ReactOS 0.4 is closer now because you
restructured the tree according to your taste? Was there any urge to do
the restructure?
> Active developers really think (at least, myself) it's a pain in the ***
The key part: "myself". Let's face it: you silently ignored my opinion
and decided not to ask anyone else. This is PITA, not the tree structure.
> that when we code on some given module (example: shell), we need to modify
> some bit of code in base/shell/whatever, some bit of code in
> dll/win32/shell32, some bit of code here and there. All the code of the
> shell should be tied together. This goes also for everything else: the core
> of NT (kernel, ntdll, "base" drivers...), the win32 subsystem (win32k; for
> it the change in r56305 started to make things more logical: you would not
> have to modify code in some win32k/ directory while also changing
> dll/win32/gdi32 or dll/win32/user32 that were by the way amongst all the
> rest of wine dlls, etc...) .
It's not "more logical", it's just different logical approaches.
> Because I didn't want to wait yet another 5 years I decided to start
> something.
Just remember, trunk is not your private branch. You have to take other
devs opinion into account. And you are not always right. Sometimes even
Alex Ionescu fails, though I must say it happens very rare.
Get used to convince people. Remember Arwinss? Did I just delete the
existing trunk win32ss back then? Imagine if I did? My reasoning was
perfect, the subsystem was superior to trunk back then in many ways, and
"I did not want to wait another 10 years for someone to finish trunk's
win32ss".
> OK my fault I would have to get a synthesis of the different proposals of
> tree restructures I got, then put in ros-dev, then wait 1 month until
> everybody starts to vote. Of course you would get people thinking it's
> better to do à la Wine and sort the files by extension type (that's what we
> almost have currently) and it was already repeated that it is BAD because it
> doesn't translate the fact that ROS/windows is built by modules; others
> would have thought it's nice to have this piece of thing next to another one
> whereas this can be postponed later on until the *obvious* parts of code
> have been properly packed together.
Yes, unless I don't know something and suddenly all your ideas are
absolutely true without the need for verification. Mine aren't, I always
consult with other skilled people.
> And because of that, here is my proposal: UNTIL details get fixed, I propose
> to:
> - keep the /boot/, /include/, /lib/, /media/ and /tools/ directories (as
> well as /cmake/ and the files in / ) untouched.
> - ntoskrnl, ntdll and the drivers we have in /drivers/ (SAUF, the multimedia
> ones) go into some main "ntcore" directory (ntcore, ntos, call it whatever
> you prefer. I'm inclined to the second name, but I'm ok with the first one).
> - the keyboard layouts can be moved either to win32ss/ or to / (in case we
> can give sense to keyboard layouts in "pure" NT, for example when we run
> usetup, etc...)
> - ok... my already-done (but revertable) modifs from 66575 (directory
> renamings can be done, it's not set in stone).
> - putting all printing support in some /win32/printsup (or "printing"...)
> directory : that means: localspl, ntprint, printui, spoolsv and spoolss, and
> winspool (so far...)
Oh, now you shared your secret plan with us. Thank you so much!
Actually, I would like to invent something better than just copying the
NT source code tree layout.
> That's what I'm 99.99% sure (and what I think is quite clear). Concerning
> the rest (that can create discussion) I still keep it in old directories.
...
> Regards,
> Hermès.
>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org] De la part de Aleksey
> Bragin
> Envoyé : vendredi 6 mars 2015 00:15
> À : ros-dev at reactos.org
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 66575: Start source tree
> (final, I hope!) restructuration. Part 1/X Win32, Shell, Services, MVDM
>> Hermes,
>> What the fuck, may I ask?
>> I don't understand since when we started doing big changes in trunk without
> talking (or listening) to anyone at all, just at your own discretion?
>> Are you so sure the change is accepted by majority of our developers?
> Did you get approval of those devs? Give them some respect which they earned
> over years with their skills and commitment.
>> I understand ReactOS is a very loosely managed project (to favor ease of
> development), but totally ignoring everyone?
> I checked CORE-9111 and I don't see any single comment from Timo, Jerome,
> James, whoever else counts.
>> Regards,
> Aleksey Bragin
> P.S. I'm not talking about actual changes, I'm talking about the process and
> attitude.
>> On 06.03.2015 2:03, hbelusca at svn.reactos.org wrote:
>> Author: hbelusca
>> Date: Thu Mar 5 23:03:33 2015
>> New Revision: 66575
>>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=66575&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Start source tree (final, I hope!) restructuration. Part 1/X Win32,
>> Shell, Services, MVDM
>>>
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list
CHAPTER VII. THE FOUR CLASSES OF SOCIETY. THE FOUR CLASSES OF SOCIETY. "After the herald had given the names of the wrestlers who were to make the first round, the fellows came in. They were dressed without any clothes to speak of, or rather they were quite undressed, with the exception of a cloth around their loins. They came in on opposite sides of the ring, and stood there about five feet apart, each man resting his hands on his knees, and glaring at the other like a wild beast. They[Pg 231] looked more like a pair of tigers than human beings, and for a moment I thought it was not at all unlike what a bull-fight in Spain might be. I turned upon her choking with anger, but her melting beauty rendered me helpless. Black woods were on our left. "Shall we turn in here?" I asked. "None of that with me," he growled. "Do you know who I am, Countess Lalage? I am Leon Lagage, Count of the Holy Roman Empire, and your husband. Incomparable woman, you cannot alter that fact. For better or worse, for richer or poorer, till death do us part!" I have in this way imperfectly indicated a methodical plan of generating a design, as far as words alone will serve, beginning with certain premises based upon a particular work to be performed, and then proceeding to consider in consecutive order the general character of the machine, mode of operation, movements and adjustments, general arrangement, strains, special arrangement, and proportions. ‘Alas! what is life, what is death, what are we, 11th January two best dresses. Commencement was as usual, with a few showers “All right,” agreed Sandy. “Dick, you and I are the ground crew. As soon as you’re ready, Mr. Whiteside, we’ll take hold!” Effects of Walpole's Administration—Formation of the new Ministry—Attitude of the Malcontents—Committee of Inquiry into Walpole's Administration—Walpole's Protectors—Ministerial Measures—Prorogation of Parliament—Disasters of the French—British Division in the Netherlands—Opening of Parliament—The German Mercenaries—Amendment of the Gin Act—George goes to Germany—Stair and De Noailles in Franconia—Stair in a Trap—Bold Resolution of King George—The Battle of Dettingen—Resignation of Stair—Retreat of the French—Negotiations for Peace—Treaty of Worms—Pelham becomes Prime Minister—The Attacks of Pitt on Carteret—Attempted Invasion of England—Its Failure—Progress of the French Arms—Frederick II. invades Bohemia—His Retirement—Resignation of Carteret—Pelham strengthens his Ministry—Death of the Emperor—Campaign in Flanders—Battle of Fontenoy—Campaign of Frederick II.—The Young Pretender's Preparations—Loss of the Elizabeth—Landing in the Hebrides—The Highland Clans join him—The First Brush—Raising of the Standard—Cope's Mistake—He turns aside at Dalwhinnie—Charles makes a Dash for Edinburgh—The March to Stirling—Right of the Dragoons—The "Canter of Coltbridge"—Edinburgh surprised by the Highlanders—Charles marching against Cope—Battle of Prestonpans—Delay in marching South—Discontent of the Highland Chiefs—The Start—Preparations in England—Apathy of the Aristocracy—Arrival of the Duke of Cumberland—Charles crosses the Border—Capture of Carlisle—The March to Derby—Resolution to retreat—"Black Friday"—The Retreat—Recapture of Carlisle—Siege of Stirling—Battle of Falkirk—Retreat to the Highlands—Cumberland's Pursuit—Gradual Collapse of the Highlanders—Battle of Culloden—Termination of the Rebellion—Cruelty of the Duke of Cumberland—Adventures of the Young Pretender—Trials and Executions—Ministerial Crisis. The next morning he was up betimes, and cooked the boys as good a breakfast as he could out of the remainder of his store and what he could get from the hospital, and then gave what was left to whoever came. The comfortable crib, which had cost the Deacon so much labor, had been pre-empted by the Surgeon for some of his weakest patients. "You two step forward one pace," he commanded. "Gentleman, I've got my six. The rest are yours." "Where are you goin'?" he said sternly. Every now and then the crowd would break into the latest rhymings of MacKinnon's poet: A large thicket, at this moment, gave the dusty foot an opportunity of doubling, and, for an instant, diverging from the straightforward course, though it availed him little, he seemed to feel the breath of his pursuer on the back of his neck; his foot sounded as if at his heels; he drew his garment closely around him, turned suddenly to the right, and, bounding from the ground, the next instant a splash was heard in the little river, and the fugitive was safe from his pursuer. HoME明日之后怎么免费刷一级纳米材料
ENTER NUMBET 0018www.serversman.com.cn www.020808.com.cn www.dsafhjjww.com.cn aishe111.net.cn iaxd.com.cn kfor.com.cn www.shagege.com.cn www.mqipr.com.cn mujiaju.com.cn www.bigbang.net.cn